To generalize is always wrong, but how wrong we are if we say that victim blaming - a phenomenon known as victim blaming - is a phenomenon not often heard in our society. It is not the first time that after a sex scandal, in this case at school premises, some people blame the victim .
The cases of two teachers in Fier shook public opinion, but meanwhile, unfortunately, there are still those who blame the girls, who are underage.
"What name do you put on this 'heart'? What parents does this 'baby' have, they call him a child? Do you see how low their parents are today? ? writes someone who thinks that the minor is also to blame.
Another calls the girls "a little foolish", while another is of the opinion that "girls have a back for five".
Ok. We stop the logic for a few minutes and let us admit a priori that girls are fools, they have a back for five and they are to blame. So this is the problem? These girls - for whose socio-psychological status we know very little - are the problem? So if these girls did not exist, would these teachers not even intend to talk "about the fact that they were jigolo", "that they know how to have good sex", "work in a public house"? So these teachers so much that they would have never intended to have sex with the same student. How foolish!
In spite of this collective tendency to blame victims, in this case some children, people must understand that whatever the circumstances, it is the duty of the teacher and anyone else in any profession, from doctor to politician, not to be tempted and not to provoke such situations. Minors are neither less nor more victims of a system where two teachers sexually abuse them, abuse their position and mission.
