Spartak Ngjela came back with another statement that would not have made sense even in a cafe debate, let alone in a television studio. In a conversation with (journalist?) Ilnisa ??Agolli, Ngjela was reminded of his statement in "Let me speak" that "when a woman is raped, after a certain moment, she begins to feel pleasure".

When Ilnisa ??reminds him of the statement, the lawyer does what he does best: he denies it, only to say… the exact same thing. To save himself logically, he starts talking about the will and morality. And what does morality have to do with a crime like rape? Don't answer that it was a rhetorical question...

Ngjela: "Listen carefully, rape is a lack of will. The will is moral".

Ilnisa ??(who doesn't need a philosophy degree to understand the absurdity): "Of course."

How can this be clear, Mr. Ngjela?

Rape and will

Let's go back to the terms Njjela uses:

Rape: A sexual act without a person's consent.

Will: The free will to do something.

So, a rape happens precisely when there is no will. Here, all normal logic ends. But no, Njjela goes further and says: "If she has not given her will, after a certain moment she may feel pleasure, but then she goes to denounce you".

So, if a woman has not consented to a sexual act, everything that happens after that is violence. And violence does not bring pleasure. On the contrary, rape leaves serious emotional, physical and psychological consequences. There is no moment of the act when the body or mind of a violated person feels "pleasure".

Njjela, considering "pleasure" as an instinctive reaction during an act of violence, shows that he does not understand either the biology of the human body or the psychology of the victims. And what's more, a lawyer saying something like that, in addition to damaging his own reputation, negatively affects the way society perceives victims of violence.

Njjela says that rape is related to morality. In fact, much of a society's morality is measured by the way it treats victims of violence. And with this statement, he has demonstrated a complete lack of morality - because justifying rape with "instinctive pleasure" is a second type of violence against women.

What Ngjela does not understand is that the body can have physiological reactions during an unwanted act, but these reactions are not pleasure, nor acceptance. They are simply biological reactions of a body trying to "survive". And equating a physical reaction with a feeling of pleasure is a huge mistake.

Can we stop for a moment?

What are you saying, Mr. Ngela? That a rape victim can feel pleasure during an act of violence? And then, with your logic, she is unforgivable because she goes and denounces?

If you haven't figured it out yet: victims don't report because they don't know the difference between "pleasure" and violence."

Instead of talking about issues that need serious treatment, Spartak Ngjela ends up in the role that suits him best: that of an unconscious dumbass.

Because, Mr. Ngjela, stringing words together to sound wise does not make you either wise or right (not even you Ilnisa, but we'll leave that for another time). On the contrary, the more you talk, the more you show that you don't even understand the essence of what you're saying.

Freedom or loneliness?

And speaking of "will" and "freedom":

In an interview, when asked why he is not married, Njela answered:

"I chose to be free."

Ah yes, true freedom, isn't it?

In fact, what appears is a loneliness, not by choice, but by the inability to have a healthy relationship with others - especially with women.

Suggested Articles: