A desire to manipulate the public or an amateurish need to interfere with every photo of the royal family? People still don't have a correct answer for the "fixation" of Kate Middleton's moment in the processing of every photo where she and members of the royal family are a part, but people are getting quite confused!
New day, new photo! This is almost becoming a slogan, as long as the Princess of Wales is caught up in yet another manipulation.
After apologizing for the photo published on March 8, on Mother's Day, where Kate admitted tampering with the image in which she appeared with the children, she said: "Like many amateur photographers, I experiment from time to time with photo editing. I wanted to apologize for any confusion caused by the family photo we posted yesterday," she wrote on Kensington Palace's official X profile.
But apparently this photo is not the only one where the princess has failed with Photoshop (a program for processing and editing photos and videos). Yesterday, there was a reaction from the spokesperson of Getty Images, who told "The Telegraph" that a photo published in April 2023 had been digitally altered. The photo taken by Kate shows Queen Elizabeth II sitting on a green sofa, surrounded by her grandchildren. "Getty Images has reviewed the image in question and placed a note stating that the image has been digitally enhanced," the spokesperson said.
View this post on Instagram
According to the photography agency, which released the photo with six alleged changes, from a vertical line on the sofa where the late queen is sitting, the skirt she is wearing that does not match the part of the figure, mysterious black shadows behind the children's ears and a blurring of the whole image.
Despite the conspiracy theories about Kate's disappearance, it seems that since the confirmation of the fact that she intervenes in the photo, it is certain that any release of photos will not pass without public scrutiny.
Maybe it's time for Kate Middleton to leave this matter to the professionals?
Suggested articles:
Source: Glamour
