After five minutes of Klodiana Lala interrupting Alfred Peza inexorably, he calls her actions a lack of education. Because, to be fair, ruthlessly interrupting someone who speaks is a lack of education. Instead of admitting the mistake, Lala further revolts and asks Peza to retract what he said and apologize. In our words it sounds like a lukewarm exchange, but the way she interrupts and the way she practically orders her to apologize after being rude for five minutes is just awful. As you can see by yourself from the eighth minute to the end.
It is clear that Lala should apologize, but it does not matter.
Even more absurd than this exchange that could be easily avoided simply by following the basic rules of conversation is the fact that such squabbles are common on screen. It all started with the election of President Trump, which was followed by debates on the screen by two opposing sides that said nothing, but were loud. The formula proved very successful. Although the audience was not being informed, the brawl attracted more viewers than any other (except sex, of course.) This tactic was first embraced by Blendi Fevziu who allowed exaggerated squabbles on the panel because he realized the screams attracted attention.
This is where the fight for the spotlight began. Capable and incompetent people, people who know what they say and people who sell everything know how to scream at each other to draw more attention to themselves. This phenomenon had a greater impact on screen women. Since they are a minority in almost every field of discussion, they need to be better than their peers to be recognized by the public and respected as authoritative figures in their field of expertise. But when they enter this new battlefield, where men simply quarrel, they can never get the attention they deserve by being quiet and presenting facts. Because they come from a position of inferiority, in this case they have to scream even more than men.
Which brings us back to Klodiana Lala and her practically hilarious behavior in the studio of "Real Story" on Neva 24. It seems impossible not to realize that the mistake in that scenario is she and not Peza who just wanted to get a heck of a sentence up. end. The worst of the two is Sokol Balla, who allowed the debate to escalate as fast as he could for five minutes and caught the attention of both the live and online viewers. Who wouldn't click a hassle between studio reporters.
When the way something is said is more than what it says, these characters who were once chilled for experience and expertise are now invited because they click. Almost every man, with the exception of Preç Zogaj, has raised his voice in the studio. Iris Luarasi, Mesila Dode, Klodiana Lala, Grida Duma have also responded to the loud voices. The television debate has turned into a race where the one who interrupts before interrupts, who shouts before they shout.
Necessarily, the value of what has to be said falls and no one hears. Try it yourself to understand what is going on in Lala's debate with Peza. In a matter of seconds, the nature of the show evolves from informative, to entertaining.
At this rate, how are we going to distinguish those who are invited to the studio because they know what they say to those who are invited to the studio because they are lasers?
